Marshall County Commissioner Jesse Bohannon had asked County Attorney Sean Surrisi to give them an update on the litigation the County Council filed against the County Commissioners on the Tamarack Solar Farm Project in Burr Oak during Monday’s meeting.
The Council filed a suit against the Commissioners after they passed the Decommissioning Plan, which allowed Tamarack Solar Energy to seek a variance for the industrial solar project. The Commissioners approved the plan on September 16th with a 2-1 vote, with Commissioner Klotz in opposition.
Surrisi said the Council filed a Notice of Dismissal of the case on January 13th. He said, “There is a procedure under the Trial Rules that allows a party who files a lawsuit to voluntarily dismiss the case if the opposing party hasn’t yet filed an answer to the complaint or a motion for summary judgment.”
The previous Board of Commissioners hired Ice Miller to represent them in the lawsuit. Tamarack Solar had filed a motion to dismiss the case, and the prior commissioners agreed and joined the motion. Surrisi said that the court had not yet considered the motion. He said the county council felt they could outright dismiss the case, and it would be over and done with.
Surrisi was notified that the Judge in Elkhart Circuit Court had called a virtual hearing for February 14th to discuss the status of the notice of dismissal and the pending motion to dismiss. He entered an appearance on behalf of the board and attended the hearing. He said the hearing lasted about 30 minutes, and the judge was curious about the procedure of the dismissal the county council filed and the pending notice to dismiss by Tamarack.
The County Attorney stated that the Council filed the dismissal “without prejudice," which means they could refile the lawsuit in the future. Surrisi mentioned that the judge would issue an order in the next couple of weeks. He also noted that the attorney for Tamarack Solar indicated that depending on the outcome of the judge’s decision, they might consider filing a motion for attorney fees.
Surrisi said Tamarack’s counsel sent a letter for their motion to dismiss to the council before they filed the lawsuit. Their position was that the County Council didn’t have the standing to bring the lawsuit and that it was “a baseless claim,” which Surrisi said he didn’t agree with. Tamarack’s counsel asserted the lawsuit was filed to influence the decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals in considering their application.
On February 19th, Judge Michael Christofeno ordered that the Plaintiff’s first amended complaint for Declaratory Judgement is hereby dismissed without prejudice according to Indiana Rule of Trial Procedure 41.
Brocksmith named 2026 Indiana Master Farmer
Unit 10 Board studying student cellphone policy
St Francisville prepares for bridge closure
Dylan Jones facing multiple first degree murder charges in Olney deaths
New round of funding for EV charging stations through IDOT
Arrest in Olney double homicide
Buerster elected to National Sigma Phi Board of Directors
Change of venue granted for Valentine murder trial
One in custody in Richland County double homicide
Garth Brooks announces The Blame It All On My Roots Tour kicking off at Gainbridge Fieldhouse
Lawrence County (Illinois) man dies from fireworks accident
Wabash General Hospital recognized among hospitals patients would highly recommend
IDOT warns of pavement failures during hot weather
Lawrence County Veterans Commission formation moves forward
Lawrence County Jail temporarily closed
