Marshall County Commissioner Jesse Bohannon had asked County Attorney Sean Surrisi to give them an update on the litigation the County Council filed against the County Commissioners on the Tamarack Solar Farm Project in Burr Oak during Monday’s meeting.
The Council filed a suit against the Commissioners after they passed the Decommissioning Plan, which allowed Tamarack Solar Energy to seek a variance for the industrial solar project. The Commissioners approved the plan on September 16th with a 2-1 vote, with Commissioner Klotz in opposition.
Surrisi said the Council filed a Notice of Dismissal of the case on January 13th. He said, “There is a procedure under the Trial Rules that allows a party who files a lawsuit to voluntarily dismiss the case if the opposing party hasn’t yet filed an answer to the complaint or a motion for summary judgment.”
The previous Board of Commissioners hired Ice Miller to represent them in the lawsuit. Tamarack Solar had filed a motion to dismiss the case, and the prior commissioners agreed and joined the motion. Surrisi said that the court had not yet considered the motion. He said the county council felt they could outright dismiss the case, and it would be over and done with.
Surrisi was notified that the Judge in Elkhart Circuit Court had called a virtual hearing for February 14th to discuss the status of the notice of dismissal and the pending motion to dismiss. He entered an appearance on behalf of the board and attended the hearing. He said the hearing lasted about 30 minutes, and the judge was curious about the procedure of the dismissal the county council filed and the pending notice to dismiss by Tamarack.
The County Attorney stated that the Council filed the dismissal “without prejudice," which means they could refile the lawsuit in the future. Surrisi mentioned that the judge would issue an order in the next couple of weeks. He also noted that the attorney for Tamarack Solar indicated that depending on the outcome of the judge’s decision, they might consider filing a motion for attorney fees.
Surrisi said Tamarack’s counsel sent a letter for their motion to dismiss to the council before they filed the lawsuit. Their position was that the County Council didn’t have the standing to bring the lawsuit and that it was “a baseless claim,” which Surrisi said he didn’t agree with. Tamarack’s counsel asserted the lawsuit was filed to influence the decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals in considering their application.
On February 19th, Judge Michael Christofeno ordered that the Plaintiff’s first amended complaint for Declaratory Judgement is hereby dismissed without prejudice according to Indiana Rule of Trial Procedure 41.
"Improving Outcomes, Together" theme for National EMS Week
Candidates can begin filing for school board elections on Tuesday
Indiana Natural Resources Commission to hold public hearing for bobcat rule changes
Single-lane closures to impact State Road 63 near Cayuga
Parke County teenage arrested after biting toddler
Duke Energy breaks ground on Cayuga Energy Complex project
Miller, Vincent lead Parke Heritage Class of 2026
May 15 is National Peace Officers Memorial Day
Indiana Conservation Officers seek help finding track chairs stolen from Fort Harrison State Park
Clay County man among six drug traffickers, including one illegal alien, sentenced to decades in federal prison
110th running of the Indianapolis 500 a sellout, local TV delay lifted
Projects wanted for READI 2.0 and Lilly Blight funding
Rockville man nabbed for harmful matter
USDA requires SNAP authorized retailers to carry more real food
Congressman Yakym's staff to hold mobile office hours in Plymouth this month
Indiana state senator working to legalize medical marijuana
“Click It or Ticket” campaign reminds Hoosiers to buckle up
IDEM introduces new “Local Air Quality Advisory” for short‑term conditions
