Attorney Michael Wukmer, with Ice Miller LLP in Indianapolis, was hired by the Marshall County Commissioners to represent them in the case filed by the County Council. On Wednesday, December 11th he submitted a motion to dismiss the complaint against the Commissioners and Tamarack Solar in court.
During the Commissioner’s meeting Monday, County Attorney Jim Clevenger told the commissioners the motions were not scheduled for a hearing. As of Friday, the judge appointed by Marshall Superior County III Judge Matthew Sarber has not yet qualified.
Clevenger said he was unsure where everything was standing.
On November 6 Attorney Michael Roose, hired by the County Council’s legal counsel Marcel Lebbin, filed a complaint for Declaratory Judgement in Marshal County Circuit Court against the County Commissioners and Tamarack Solar Energy LLC.
In the motion to dismiss under Legal Standing, Attorney Wukmer states that Tamarack demonstrated in its brief that the Council does not have a legal interest in declaring the actions of the Commissioners to be invalid and therefore lacks standing to assert the conflict of interest in Count I and the same applies to Count II in which the Council seeks to challenge the Commissioner’s approval of Tamarack’s Economic Development Agreement.
Indiana Code 36-2-2-2 states that the executive branch of government, the county commissioners, negotiates contracts for the county and the Economic Development Agreement is a contract.
Under Insufficient Facts: the motion says Tamarack’s brief does an excellent job of demonstrating that the amended complaint filed by the Council, “does not allege any facts that would remotely support that the Council has “a personal state in the outcome of the litigation.” Wukmer writes, “Specifically, there are no facts that demonstrate a present conflict of interest by Commissioner Overmyer.” The Council alleges that Overmyer has an interest in the Decommissioning Plan Agreement that was approved by the commissioners, but that was a legal conclusion and not a fact.
While Commissioner Overmyer has real estate in the general proximity of Tamarack’s proposed solar farm, it is completely and legally a separate tract of real estate that is not factually tied to Tamarack’s proposed solar farm in any way.
The motion to dismiss states, “The Court must look at the Complaint for what it is, the Council’s attempt to control the power of the Commissioners. There are no facts or law under which the Council can prevail.” The motion urges the court to dismiss the amended complaint.
Smith looks to claim Parke County Commissioner seat
USDA opens enrollment for Grassland Conservation Reserve Program
Governor ceremonially signs bill co-authored by Baird to combat animal cruelty
New online portal brings transparency to Indiana gas prices during declared energy emergency
Electric vehicle fire training held at Rockville-Adams Township Training Center
Indiana FSSA announces results of HCBS attendant care audits - $200 Million in improper payments
Applications being accepted for Governor’s 2026 Century and Half Century Business Awards
Indiana BMV extending hours for primary election
$675 million impact reported from initial Regional Economic Development funding
PHMS Amazing Shake
Parke Heritage students in competition at FFA District Contest
Indiana's February unemployment rate below national average
Indiana hiring five county executive directors in training positions
Be on the lookout for farm equipment on the road
SW Parke projected to save over a million dollars closing Montezuma Elementary
Changes coming to South Vermillion School Corporation's cell phone policy
Crawfordsville man faces list of felony child sex charges
Domestic incident results in arrest in Parke County
