The bill proposes a requirement for multiple dual-message networks to operate on a single card — a move that is not only technologically impractical but would also come with a staggering price tag for consumers.
Indiana has always thrived on the determination and resilience of its people. However, today, the fruits of that hard work are being undercut by rising costs, federal regulations and policies that make it increasingly difficult for Hoosiers to sustain their livelihoods.
One troubling example of this is the Credit Card Competition Act (CCCA), a piece of legislation currently making its way through Congress. At first glance, the bill seems straightforward — it aims to limit interchange fees on credit cards and give merchants more control over the electronic payment networks they use. But a closer look reveals that the CCCA is not the pro-competition measure its name suggests. In reality, it would stifle competition and increase government intervention in the credit card industry.
The bill proposes a requirement for multiple dual-message networks to operate on a single card — a move that is not only technologically impractical but would also come with a staggering price tag for consumers. Implementing such a system could cost up to $5 billion, a burden that would ultimately fall on credit card users. At a time when families across Indiana are already grappling with rising prices, forcing them to shoulder unnecessary costs to overhaul a functioning system is the wrong move.
Beyond the immediate financial burden, the CCCA also threatens to undermine fundamental market freedoms by allowing the federal government to interfere in private contracts. This intrusion could force smaller community banks and credit unions to stop offering co-branded credit cards, which are popular among consumers. Even worse, it could lead to the end of rewards programs that millions of Americans rely on for everyday expenses such as travel, gas and groceries.
We’ve seen similar misguided policies before. In 2010, Congress passed the Durbin Amendment, which imposed similar restrictions on debit card transactions. Rather than benefiting consumers, the result was a reduction in perks and free services previously offered by banks. A report from the Government Accountability Office found that 65% of non-interest checking accounts would have remained free had those regulations not been enacted.
We can learn from past mistakes as the passage of the CCCA would lead to similar outcomes. Consumers would be forced to foot the bill for fixing a credit card system that doesn’t need fixing, and the rewards programs many families rely on would be significantly reduced, especially during a time of economic strain.
I hope Sens. Mike Braun (R-IN) and Todd Young (R-IN) will recognize the harm this bill could cause and stand with their constituents by voting against it.
"Improving Outcomes, Together" theme for National EMS Week
Candidates can begin filing for school board elections on Tuesday
Indiana Natural Resources Commission to hold public hearing for bobcat rule changes
Single-lane closures to impact State Road 63 near Cayuga
Parke County teenage arrested after biting toddler
Duke Energy breaks ground on Cayuga Energy Complex project
Miller, Vincent lead Parke Heritage Class of 2026
May 15 is National Peace Officers Memorial Day
Indiana Conservation Officers seek help finding track chairs stolen from Fort Harrison State Park
Clay County man among six drug traffickers, including one illegal alien, sentenced to decades in federal prison
110th running of the Indianapolis 500 a sellout, local TV delay lifted
Projects wanted for READI 2.0 and Lilly Blight funding
Rockville man nabbed for harmful matter
USDA requires SNAP authorized retailers to carry more real food
Congressman Yakym's staff to hold mobile office hours in Plymouth this month
Indiana state senator working to legalize medical marijuana
“Click It or Ticket” campaign reminds Hoosiers to buckle up
IDEM introduces new “Local Air Quality Advisory” for short‑term conditions
