The bill proposes a requirement for multiple dual-message networks to operate on a single card — a move that is not only technologically impractical but would also come with a staggering price tag for consumers.
Indiana has always thrived on the determination and resilience of its people. However, today, the fruits of that hard work are being undercut by rising costs, federal regulations and policies that make it increasingly difficult for Hoosiers to sustain their livelihoods.
One troubling example of this is the Credit Card Competition Act (CCCA), a piece of legislation currently making its way through Congress. At first glance, the bill seems straightforward — it aims to limit interchange fees on credit cards and give merchants more control over the electronic payment networks they use. But a closer look reveals that the CCCA is not the pro-competition measure its name suggests. In reality, it would stifle competition and increase government intervention in the credit card industry.
The bill proposes a requirement for multiple dual-message networks to operate on a single card — a move that is not only technologically impractical but would also come with a staggering price tag for consumers. Implementing such a system could cost up to $5 billion, a burden that would ultimately fall on credit card users. At a time when families across Indiana are already grappling with rising prices, forcing them to shoulder unnecessary costs to overhaul a functioning system is the wrong move.
Beyond the immediate financial burden, the CCCA also threatens to undermine fundamental market freedoms by allowing the federal government to interfere in private contracts. This intrusion could force smaller community banks and credit unions to stop offering co-branded credit cards, which are popular among consumers. Even worse, it could lead to the end of rewards programs that millions of Americans rely on for everyday expenses such as travel, gas and groceries.
We’ve seen similar misguided policies before. In 2010, Congress passed the Durbin Amendment, which imposed similar restrictions on debit card transactions. Rather than benefiting consumers, the result was a reduction in perks and free services previously offered by banks. A report from the Government Accountability Office found that 65% of non-interest checking accounts would have remained free had those regulations not been enacted.
We can learn from past mistakes as the passage of the CCCA would lead to similar outcomes. Consumers would be forced to foot the bill for fixing a credit card system that doesn’t need fixing, and the rewards programs many families rely on would be significantly reduced, especially during a time of economic strain.
I hope Sens. Mike Braun (R-IN) and Todd Young (R-IN) will recognize the harm this bill could cause and stand with their constituents by voting against it.
Friday is National Wear Red Day
Vermillion County DCS worker facing felonies
One week left to file for office in Indiana
Bridge closures to impact State Road 42 over I-70 in Clay County
Road renaming resolution co-authored by Criswell to honor Bobby Knight passes House
Thrive West Central to host Utility Workshop
Greene Realty continues to grow
World Food Championships set for 2026 Indianapolis return
SW Parke Community Schools looking at Revision Project
NWS extends Winter Storm Warning to Monday morning
IDHS activates State Emergency Operations Center in response to winter storm
Scholarship Fund honors former Coach Blank
Winter Storm Watch in effect for the weekend, heavy snow possible
ISP releases Human Trafficking Awareness Initiative results
Indiana House Page Program available during 2026 session
Indiana State Police seeks volunteer chaplains to support trooper wellness and resilience
