Attorney General Todd Rokita, together with Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador and a coalition of 24 states, has filed an amicus curiae brief in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals strongly arguing that the Eighth Amendment does not require states to provide prisoners with risky, controversial, and medically debated sex-change surgeries.
The case, Emalee R. Wagoner v. Jennifer Winkelman, Commissioner of Department of Corrections (No. 25-6813), arises from a U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska order directing the state to refer the prisoner for surgical consultation. The multi-state brief argues that this ruling exceeds constitutional limits and overrides states' authority over prison medical care and policy, so the decision should be reversed.
According to Attorney General Rokita, Indiana is co-leading this brief because a ruling upholding the order could create a nationwide precedent. That would pressure prison systems across the country—including in Indiana—to provide or pay for similar surgeries, even though many states do not offer them to inmates or even to free citizens.
"The Eighth Amendment stops cruel and unusual punishment. It doesn’t give prisoners the right to demand risky, optional surgeries when doctors and scientists still strongly disagree about whether they’re safe or even helpful," said Attorney General Rokita. "If courts force states to provide these expensive, controversial procedures in one prison, it will open the floodgates everywhere—putting Hoosier taxpayers and families across the country on the hook for hundreds of thousands of dollars per surgery in virtually every state. We cannot let that happen. We have to win this case to protect hardworking taxpayers from footing the bill for these insane surgeries.”
The brief stresses that the Eighth Amendment bars deliberate indifference to serious medical needs but does not guarantee prisoners access to any particular treatment—especially those that are unproven, highly debated, and carry significant risks with uncertain benefits.
It notes that such surgeries are unavailable to free citizens in nearly half of U.S. states, underscoring they are not a basic necessity. The amici also contend that prior Ninth Circuit case law does not require these procedures, and mandating out-of-state prisoner transfers for unavailable care raises major federalism issues and conflicts with the Prison Litigation Reform Act.
The coalition asks the Ninth Circuit to vacate the district court’s injunction and affirm states’ discretion in managing prisoner healthcare and corrections.
Attached is the brief in defense of President Trump’s executive order.
Vincennes man arrested in connection with fatal fire
Red Hill Unit #10 adopts fiscal year budget;sets high school graduation
Lawrenceville to seek state sidewalk improvement grant
Early voting for November election underway in Illinois
Postal Service recommends 2026 holiday mailing and shipping dates
Lawrence County high schools recognized for student financial aid services
Mock emergency drill planned in Lawrence County
Unit #20 fiscally sound after passage of 2026-27 budget
Illinois to close eight state visitor information centers
Niemerg issues statement on no cash bail anniversary
Lawrence County drivers reminded of Child Passenger Safety Week
Fire injures one person in Vincennes
Farm harvest safety reminders for drivers
Southwestern Indiana fugitive arrested in Illinois after multi-county chase
Governor Braun proclaims Indiana Rail Safety Week September 21-27
Lawrence County (ILL.) man charged with child sex crime
